Once again I will be away on a trip. I should return at the end of this month, so AmateurNikon will be back with new articles in early February. Take care!
Introduction
Another comparative review for today - they are quite popular, I've come to notice; see ultra-wide angle lenses for DX, 3 super zooms, 3 budget macros for DX, and 5 budget normal primes.Today's article will be slightly different than those above, in that the focus will not be on scope (e.g. super zooms, macros, etc) but on type.Today's article compares 3 "must-have" Nikkor AI-s lenses for your Nikon camera.
A couple of caveats and disclaimers:
- "must-have" is a relative term. There are no "must-have" lenses, as it all boils down to your personal needs and situation.
- If you're an entry-level (and DX) user, AIs lenses means no metering. Additionally, your camera's smaller viewfinder makes manual focus harder.
AI-s lenses (like this beauty) are usually characterized by excellent build quality |
So, now we got this out of the way, let's begin.
Analysis
The lenses I picked for this list are:Let's take a quick look at the pros and cons, then I'll give you an overview and my observations, including thoughts on whether you should consider these lenses (and why).
Nikon Nikkor AI-s 50mm f/1.2
+ large maximum aperture, excellent for low light or subject isolation
+ brilliant optically, incredibly sharp from f/2 and smaller, beautiful bokeh
+ unique lens; nothing like it in Nikon's selection
The bokeh of the 50mm f/1.2 is too good to be true! |
- manual focus and f/1.2 can frustrate you. Split-screen highly recommended
- expensive (it's an awesome investment, though)
- large front element susceptible to damage/dirt. Use hood or high-quality filter
Nikon micro-Nikkor AI-s 55mm f/2.8
+ stunning optically, already wide-open, especially in close distance (it's a macro, what did you expect?)
+ cheap, small, light - the perfect expendable macro lens for "danger zone" missions (e.g. near sand, water, etc.)
+ great manual-focus feedback allows for precision when focusing
Sharp enough for you? The 55mm f/2.8 is so sharp, it produces artifacts (if you're not careful with your settings)! |
- susceptible to aperture blade damage (mostly oil); check before using, then return if needed
- working distance isn't ideal for bugs
- optical quality deteriorates a bit when focused on infinity (in other words, not a general-purpose lens, and definitely not an astrophotography lens)
Nikon Nikkor AI-s 105mm f/1.8
+ like most AI-s lenses, it's built like a tank. Very sturdy and reliable
+ the manual-focus feel needs to be experienced to be believed. Incredibly smooth yet precise
+ optically almost flawless, with only one observation (read below)
I've gotten some great results on film with the 105mm f/1.8 |
- there is falloff that goes away by f/4 - irrelevant for portraiture (which is the main application for this lens)
- it's built like a tank, it weighs as much: heavy for its size
- prices can be high, even used.
Conclusion
Let's clarify one more thing - come to think of it, this could be the third disclaimer point: If you're simply looking for a great lens to take pictures with, you don't need any of these lenses. Get a modern autofocus equivalent (quick suggestions: Nikon Nikkor 50mm AF f/1.8, Nikon micro-Nikkor AF-S 60mm f/2.8, Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.8) and you're all set. They're more-or-less the same thing, and easier to use.But photography as art is different than photography as a technical endeavor. In art, we don't always do what's easy; we do what is inspiring. And let me tell you, few things are more inspiring than shooting with one of these lenses.
The 50mm f/1.2 is a unique lens, there is nothing like it in Nikon's lineup. Realize that, although it's a manual-focus AI-s lens, it's still available for sale as new. Needless to say, if you're remotely into investing in lenses, collector's items, etc, buy
The micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 is exactly the opposite story: it's not a collector's item, nor will it ever be; it's not unique in any immediately apparent way, and you can find other good, cheap macro lenses for your Nikon camera. So, what's the deal? Two things: a) its low price makes it a very attractive solution when you need an expendable lens (and not the great but overpriced 105mm AF-S) ;b) I can't measure it (as you know AmateurNikon is about experience, not diagrams) but having tried dozens of macro lenses, I've never seen a sharper one. There, I said it. The micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 always gives me a biting-sharp, high-microcontrast image that I can't seem to get from other lenses. We're splitting hairs perhaps, but that's my personal experience and the reason I'm still using this although I own modern (and excellent) macro lenses, such as the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 OS.
Finally, the 105mm f/1.8 is a lens that, perhaps curiously, has become relevant again in the era of the new Nikon Nikkor AF-S 105mm f/1.4. The 105mm f/1.8 Ai-s isn't a cheap lens, but it's a heck of a lot cheaper than the modern version (which of course has autofocus, is a bit faster, and based on a quick test in my local shop, seems to be one of the sharpest things Nikon has ever made). But if you want a faster-than-f/2 105mm lens and can't afford the new one, this old workhorse can offer you some pretty stunning portraits.
No comments:
Post a Comment