Fast normal lens. Very cheap, very good. Is the absence of auto-focus a problem?
Pros/Cons
+ fast normal lens, excellent for low light or subject isolation
+ excellent image quality, as expected. Incredibly sharp and beautiful bokeh
+ very cheap - it's amazing how great image quality you can get with so little money
- manual focus can be challenging, but f/2 is better than, say, f/1.2
- tiny bit of contrast loss wide-open, nothing to worry about though.
- non-AI versions easier to find than AI. Make sure your camera is compatible (those Nikons without focus motor, such as D3xxx series, D5xxx series, D40, etc. can also take the pre-AI)
Taken at f/4. By that aperture, the lens has no flaws, really |
Intended Users
Great for:
- people who look for a fast, quality lens, but are on a tight budget.
- great lens for a macro reversing solution - make sure its filter ring is intact
- low light or portrait work, this lens is in its element
Not for:
- anything moving - not impossible, but it can be very frustrating
- those who have a camera with focus motor - get the AF 50mm f/1.8 instead. Being able to autofocus is certainly worth the bit extra money
- too tight spaces/indoors. 50mm on DX is not great for small spaces.
Final Verdict
A great lens. Very cheap, very well built, and with excellent image quality. It's very cheap as well, which makes it a very attractive solution for people with entry level cameras who look for a (very) affordable fast lens which can deliver excellent image quality. Just keep in mind, however, that you will have to use your camera in Manual mode and guess the exposure.
No comments:
Post a Comment